Writers and Editors

Apr 28, 2011 2:06 PM EDT

Pat, thanks so much for your kind words about Talking Writing and your excellent recap of the issue. We're so glad you found us!

- Elizabeth Langosy, Executive Editor, Talking Writing

Mar 23, 2011 8:23 AM EDT

Another reaction:• Judge rejects Google's attempt to create a universal library (Laurie Segall, CNN Money 3-22-2011)."Google's settlement agreement is a complex, 166-page document. While the company took pains to protect the rights of copyright holders -- only tiny snippets are revealed from in-print books -- it put the burden on authors and publishers to police their works' inclusion in the archive. Google will remove books on request, but without an explicit request, it will otherwise digitize anything it can get hold of.That didn't sit well with Judge Chin. He also expressed concern over the agreement's handling of "orphaned" books -- works that are still under copyright, but no longer in print."'The questions of who should be entrusted with guardianship over orphan books, under what terms, and with what safeguards are matters more appropriately decided by Congress than through an agreement among private, self-interested parties,' Chin wrote in his ruling."

- PM

Mar 25, 2011 8:28 AM EDT

And another: Google Books: Headed for the Bonfire? (Erik Sherman, BNET Wired In blog, 3-23-11, which links to his earlier posts). Sherman writes:"The two sides negotiated a highly controversial settlement that drew extensive criticism from the Department of Justice, including the following: * "Class action suits generally address past actions. This one allowed Google to display copyrighted works in the future for anyone who did not opt out of the agreement. * "It seemed questionable that any representative could adequately represent all rights owners, especially those who were unreachable but who owned rights to books that were under copyright protection but out of print. * "Google needed active permission to use the in-print works but not out-of-print. Rights owners that did not claim money within five years would forfeit their money to those already registered. So the deal was stacked in the favor of those with rights to books currently in print, even though Google wanted to scan and display the out-of-print books."

- PM

Feb 08, 2016 10:18 AM EST

For updates on the Google Book settlement, go here:Google Book Settlement (Pro and Con)

- PM